The
Fifth Precept, in Which the Deceitful Error
of the Rich of this World is
Exposed
IN addition to what has been already said, I must add the refutation of
a certain error very prevalent among the rich of this world, and which greatly
hinders them from living well and dying well. The error consists in this: the
rich suppose that the wealth they possess is absolutely their own property, if
justly acquired; and that therefore they may lawfully spend, give away, or
squander their money, and that no one can say to them, "Why do you do so?
Why dress so richly? Why feast so sumptuously? Why so prodigal in supporting
your dogs and hawks? Why do you spend so much money in gaming, or other
such-like pleasures?" They will answer: "What is it to you? Is it not
lawful for me to do what I will with my own?" Now, this error is doubtless
most grievous and pernicious: for, granting that the "rich" are the
masters of their own property with relation to other men; yet, with regard to
God, they are not masters, but only administrators or stewards. This truth can
be proved by many arguments. Hear the royal prophet: "The earth is the
Lord’s, and the fullness thereof: the world and all they that dwell
therein." (Psalm xxiii.) And again: " For all the beasts of the wood
are mine: the cattle on the hills, and the oxen. If I should be hungry, I would
not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fullness thereof." (Psalm
xlix.)
And in the first book of Paralipomenon, when David had offered for the
building of the temple three thousand talents of gold and seven thousand
talents of silver, and Parian marble in the greatest abundance; and when, moved
by the example of the king, the princes of the tribes had offered five thousand
talents of gold, and ten thousand of silver, and eighteen thousand of brass,
and a hundred thousand of iron, then David said to God: "Thine, O Lord, is
magnificence, and power, and glory, and victory: and to thee is praise; for all
that is in heaven or earth is thine: thine is the kingdom, Lord, and thon art
above all princes. Thine are riches, and thine is glory, thou hast dominion
over all: in thy and is power and might: in thy hand greatness and the empire
of all things. Who am I, what is my people, that we should be able to promise
thee all these things? All things are thine; and we have given thee what we
have received of thy hand." (chap. xxix. 11, &c.) To these may be
added the testimony of God Himself, who by Aggæus the prophet saith: "Mine
is silver, and mine is gold." This the Lord spoke, that the people might
understand that for the new building of the temple nothing would be wanting,
since He himself would order its erection, to whom belonged all the gold and
silver in the world.
I shall add two more testimonies from the words of Christ, in the New
Testament: " There was a certain rich man who had a steward: and the same
was accused unto him, that he had wasted his goods. And he called him, and said
to him: How is it I hear this of thee? Give an account of thy stewardship: for
now thou canst be steward no longer." (St. Luke xvi.) By the "rich
man" is here meant God, who, as we have just said, crieth out by the
prophet Aggæus: "Mine is silver, and mine is gold." By the
"steward" is to be understood a rich man, as the holy Fathers teach,
St. Chrysostom, St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, Venerable Bede, besides Theophylact,
and Euthymius, and others on this passage.
If the Gospel, then, is to be credited, every rich man of this world
must acknowledge that the riches he possesses, whether justly or unjustly
acquired, are not his: that if they be justly acquired, he is only the steward
of them; if unjustly, that he is nothing but a thief and a robber. And since
the rich man is not the master of the wealth he possesses, it follows that,
when accused of injustice before God, God removes him from his stewardship,
either by death or by want: such do the words signify, "Give an account of
thy stewardship, for now thou canst be steward no longer."
God will never be in want of ways to reduce the rich to poverty, and
thus to remove them from their stewardship: such as by shipwrecks, robberies,
hail-storms, cankers, too much rain, drought, and many other kinds of
afflictions so many voices of God exclaiming to the rich: "Thou canst be
steward no longer."
But when, towards the end of the parable, our Lord says: "Make
unto you friends of the mammon of iniquity, that when you shall fail, they may
receive you into everlasting dwellings," He does not mean that alms are to
he given out of unjust riches, but of riches that are not riches, properly so
speaking, but only the shadows of them. This is evidently the meaning from
another passage in the same Gospel of St. Luke: " If then you have not
been faithful in the unjust mammon, who will trust you with that which is the
true?" The meaning of these words is: "If in the unjust mammon"
that is, false riches "you have not been faithful" in giving
liberally to the poor, "who will trust you" with true riches the
riches of virtues, which make men truly rich? This is the explanation given by
St. Cyprian, and also by St. Augustine in the second book of his Evangelical
Questions, where he says that mammon signifies "riches;" which the
foolish and wicked alone consider to be riches, whilst wise and good men
despise them, and assert that spiritual gifts are alone to be considered true
riches.
There is another passage in the same Gospel of St. Luke, which may be
considered as a kind of commentary on the unjust steward: "There was a
certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen, and feasted
sumptuously every day. And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, who lay at
his gate, full of sores. Desiring to be filled with the crumbs that fell from
the rich man's table, and no one did give him; moreover, the dogs came and
licked his sores. And it came to pass that the beggar died, and was carried by
the angels into Abraham's bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried
in hell." This Dives was certainly one of those who supposed he was master
of his own money, and not a steward under God; and therefore he imagined not
that he offended against God, when he was clothed in purple and linen, and
feasted sumptuously every day, and had his dogs, and his buffoons, & c. For
he perhaps said within himself: " I spend my own money, I do no injury to
any one, I violate not the laws of God, I do not blaspheme nor swear, I observe
the sabbath, I honour my parents, I do not kill, nor commit adultery, nor
steal, nor bear false witness, nor do I covet my neighbour’s wife, or anything
else." But if such was the case, why was he buried in hell? why tormented
in the fire? We must then acknowledge that all those are deceived who suppose
they are the "absolute" masters of their money; for if Dives had any
more grievous sins to answer for, the Holy Scripture would certainly have
mentioned them. But since nothing more has been added, we are given to
understand that the superfluous adornment of his body with costly garments, and
his daily magnificent banquets, and the multitude of his servants and dogs,
whilst he had no compassion for the poor, was a sufficient cause of his
condemnation to eternal torments.
taken from the Art of Dying Well, by Saint Robert Bellarmine
Photo taken from Wikimedia Commons
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your interest in our blog! Your comment will be viewed shortly to be added to our blog. :)